Passers-by on public roads are not considered as interested parties with regard to CCTV monitoring

  • in 2018
Passers-by on public roads are not considered as interested parties with regard to CCTV monitoring 2560 1707 SarisLaw

On 21 February 2018, the Administrative Jurisdiction Division ruled that appellant is not an interested party in a request for enforcement to remove security cameras along the public road that she regularly passes by due to family visits. The appellant’s invocation of the fundamental right of Article 8 of the ECHR – the right to respect for private life – does not make her an interested party in this case either. Therefore, the municipality was right to reject the appellant’s request for enforcement.

The full blog post is written in Dutch.

Date: 21 February 2018
ECLI: ECLI:NL:RVS:2018:590
Author: Christien Saris

 

Administrative Jurisdiction Division applies the administrative loop when determining the amount of a health & safety fine. The size of a company affects the amount of the fine
Fine overthrown: amount of fine in municipal Housing Bylaw is in breach of the law
Zoekwoord