In its decision of 28 October 2020, the Administrative Jurisdiction Division provides the assessment framework for the reconsideration of objections by administrative authorities that must decide on decisions to impose remedial…
read moreIn its judgment of 30 June 2020 (ECLI:NL:HR:2020:1155), the Supreme Court confirmed that the use of supervisory powers under administrative law is not permitted if the investigation by investigating officers…
read moreIn his opinion of 11 March 202, advocate general Wattel states that when an administrative authority is reconsidered whether it must (still) take enforcement action by imposing remedial sanctions, it…
read moreAdministrative judge is obliged to caution the (legal) person on whom a fine is imposed at a hearing
In its judgment of 15 November 2019, the Supreme Court (Tax Division) ruled that in administrative penalty cases, the administrative judge is obliged to always caution a person on whom…
read moreThe Lower House of Parliament is currently debating the legislative proposal to amend the General Administrative Law Act (GAL) and some other laws in connection with the new environmental law…
read moreIn its judgment of 15 November 2019, the Supreme Court clearly outlined the process of summoning and questioning of witnesses by the administrative courts. That judgment, delivered by the Tax…
read moreOn 17 January 2018, the internet consultation was launched in connection with the entry into force of the Environment and Planning Act. This consultation also has consequences for the General…
read moreIn his conclusion of 24 January 2018, advocate general Widdershoven concluded in an important matter for the enforcement practice that an administrative warning based on a statutory provision is a…
read moreIn a judgment of 26 October 2016, the Administrative Jurisdiction Division gave a new interpretation to the inherent power to derogate of Article 4:84 of the General Administrative Law Act…
read more