In its judgment of 29 May 2020 (ECLI:NL:HR:2020:973), the Supreme Court devoted an interesting consideration to how the tax court should assess the proportionality of administrative penalties. The Supreme Court…
read moreAdministrative judge is obliged to caution the (legal) person on whom a fine is imposed at a hearing
In its judgment of 15 November 2019, the Supreme Court (Tax Division) ruled that in administrative penalty cases, the administrative judge is obliged to always caution a person on whom…
read more
Summoning and questioning of witnesses in administrative law: how does it work again?
https://sarislaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/shutterstock_1812892960-scaled.jpg
2560
1707
SarisLaw
//sarislaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Logo-SarisLaw.svg
In its judgment of 15 November 2019, the Supreme Court clearly outlined the process of summoning and questioning of witnesses by the administrative courts. That judgment, delivered by the Tax…
read more
Supreme Court: no ne-bis-in-idem in criminal proceedings for human trafficking after an administrative fine has been imposed for employing foreign nationals
https://sarislaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/stuntvliegtuig.jpg
1000
667
SarisLaw
//sarislaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Logo-SarisLaw.svg
In this case, an administrative fine imposed on an employer for employing a foreign national without a work permit and it’s subsequent criminal prosecution for human smuggling do not result…
read more
Arrangements among parties are allowed regarding the apportionment of liability for fines
https://sarislaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/contract.jpg
1000
667
SarisLaw
//sarislaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Logo-SarisLaw.svg
On 11 December 2015, the Dutch Supreme Court held that a party can rely on a clause to recover a fine imposed by a public body (verhaalsbeding) from a contractual…
read more